![]() ![]() The grid tell you how many consecutive cells around it have to be coloured. ![]() ![]() The shape can't have any 2 by 2 coloured areas. Originally I was going to have 16 clue in squares, but there were just too many clues, so make the other two corners triangles instead.Ĭontiguous shape. I don't normally put clues next to eachother much, so I gave that a try. The larger one was all about finding an opening. It's one of the harder smaller puzzles in the set. It took a while to get it correct, so that the middle turned out unique. The small one was just all about interaction between adjacent clues. But as it's become such an established genre I gave it another try. I have solved so many Tapas already with the TVC, CTC, Serkan Yurekli's Tapa book and the upcoming GM Puzzles book and all the others available online. I find it hard to think of fun new ways to start a puzzle. I tend to write less puzzles of types I have written many of before. I hadn't written any Tapa puzzles in a while. Indicate the length of the line of the fisherman. But it shouldn't cause too many problems.Ī line from each Fisherman (number) to a fish by moving horizontally and The larger one requires a bit of counting to get the larger numbers right, especially in the end. The smaller one is a really small and sweet puzzle. I think the set will have worked well none-the-less for all solvers with the easier puzzles to work with as well, but I'd love to hear some feedback form those who were there. I couldn't really decide well which puzzles to cut so I sent in the whole set and let them know that they could leave out a puzzle type if necessary. During their testing 3 of the larger puzzles seem to have cause some problems as they went up in score. The smaller puzzles made that average pretty well, but the larger puzzles were more inching towards 5-5.5 average and all of them had some outliers. I had the set tested by Prasanna Seshadri, James McGowan and Stefan Gaspar. I was hoping to average about 1.5 minutes per puzzle on the smaller ones and about 4.5 minutes per puzzle on the larger ones. I decided to write 2 puzzles per type, one smaller/easier one and a larger/harder one. Last year's set was a bit on the difficult side, so I tried to think of a way to rectify that this year. Tomorrow I will post the Team round puzzles with a special surprise. This post will feature all the puzzles from my individual round. You can find all puzzles of the Championships in the following link: Sudoku Rounds + Team Round, Puzzle Rounds. I contributed a set for the Puzzle Championships for the individual round and wrote a team round together with Zoltan Horvath. The final results remained almost the same with Przemyslaw Dębiak finishing first, followed by Zoltan Horvath, Matus Demiger and Tomasz Stróżak. The Puzzle playoffs featured Przemysław Dębiak, Matus Demiger, Zoltan Horvath and Tomasz Stróżak. The Sudoku playoffs featured Tiit Vunk, Jakub Ondrousek, Jan Mrozowski and Krystian Swiderski. Jakub Ondrousek finish first in the playoffs, followed by Krystian Swiderski, Tiit Vunk and Jan Mrozowski, making Krystian Swiderski the new Polish Sudoku champion. The playoffs would feature the best 4 solvers, while having at least two Polish solvers. The Championship was also open to International solvers this year. Last weekend were the Polish Sudoku and Puzzle Championships. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |